• 科技发展
    工作的未来:在第四次工业革命中将改变的五种重要方式 The Future Of Work: 5 Important Ways Jobs Will Change In The 4th Industrial Revolution 在许多方面,工作的未来已经存在。在由于人工智能(AI),机器学习和自主系统带来的自动化和其他变化导致的预期失业工作的标题中,很明显我们的工作和生活方式正在改变。这种演变可能令人不安。既然我们知道变革是不可避免的,那么让我们来看看工作可能会如何变化以及如何为变革做准备。 5种工作方式将在未来发生变化 根据麦肯锡全球研究所的报告,至少有30%与美国大多数职业相关的活动可以实现自动化,其中包括以前被认为是安全的知识任务。这与高管们所看到的相呼应,并促使Intuit首席人才官Rick Jensen说:“ 劳动力正在大规模改变。“以下是一些方法: 1.活跃的零工 在一个组织内,职位将更加流畅,并且可能会抛出严格的组织结构图,以支持更多基于项目的团队。这对Z世代的员工尤其具有吸引力,因为75%的Z一代员工会对在一个工作场所担任多个角色感兴趣。专业人士作为承包商或自由职业者签约后,“零工”经济将继续扩大,然后进入下一个工作。 2.  分散的劳动力 由于移动技术和随时可用的互联网接入,远程工作人员已经很普遍。员工不需要在同一个地方。这将使下一代工人更容易选择住在任何地方,而不是找工作,然后搬到有这份工作的城市。 3.工作的动力 人们需要的不仅仅是薪水,而是工作的动力。许多人希望为一个具有他们所信仰的使命和目标的组织工作。他们还需要不同的激励措施,例如个人发展机会,最新的技术设备,以促进他们的工作,从任何地方的野心,等等。 4.终身学习 员工不仅希望在整个职业生涯中学习,而且还需要学习新技能。技术将继续发挥人类在劳动力中所扮演的角色,因此每个人都需要在整个职业生涯中调整自己的技能。 5.技术将增加人类的工作 人工智能算法和智能机器将成为人类的共同工作者。人力劳动力需要提高一定程度的舒适度和接受度,以便人和机器如何利用最佳的工作方式进行协作。 如何为工作的未来做好准备 尽管我们无法预测将来会发生的所有变化,但我们确实有一定的确定性,即人们可以做些准备工作。 而不是屈服于“机器人将接管所有工作”的世界末日预言,更乐观的观点是人类有机会去做需要他们的创造力,想象力,社交和情感智慧以及激情的工作。 个人需要采取行动并参与终身学习,因此他们可以在变化发生时适应。任何特定技能组合的寿命都在缩小,因此个人必须继续投资获取新技能。现在需要转变为终身学习,因为这些变化已经发生。 此外,员工还需要塑造自己的职业道路。在一家公司概述职业发展轨迹的日子已经一去不复返了。因此,员工应该追求多元化的工作经验,并主动塑造自己的职业道路。 个人需要进入追求激情的机会,而不是缩回过去成功的机会。这种工作转变开启了实现更大潜力的可能性。我们需要开始认为工作不仅仅是薪水。 雇主需要以不同的方式思考他们如何招聘和雇用新员工。公司需要审查潜在员工的潜力,并评估不太可能在短期内实现自动化的技能,包括情商,批判性思维,创造力和解决问题的技能。 雇主需要调整运营的另一种方式是创建一种尊重终身学习的结构和文化,并颂扬创造力。现在是雇主评估他们的福利和激励计划的时候了,以确保他们提供下一代员工想要的动力,以吸引最优秀的人才。 虽然没有什么是确定的,但对每个人来说,重要的是开始朝着为机器成为同事的未来做准备的方向迈出一步。如果我们今天没有开始适应变化,那么以后赶上来就很难。   作者:Bernard Marr 原文来自:https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2019/07/15/the-future-of-work-5-important-ways-jobs-will-change-in-the-4th-industrial-revolution/#692b33b854c7 以上由AI翻译完成,仅供参考
    科技发展
    2019年08月11日
  • 科技发展
    科技发展如此迅猛,短视频一则 看看这个小视频。越来越多的无人值守的服务开始。 HR该思考点什么? [video width="480" height="864" mp4="http://wp.hrtechchina.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/tuirangyixia.mp4"][/video]     诸如此类的应用还有很多,我们可以看出端倪和发展趋势
    科技发展
    2019年07月20日
  • 科技发展
    不一样的角度来看待科技的发展:I was wrong. Too much tech is ruining lives 作者:Vivek Wadhwa     Distinguished Fellow at Carnegie Mellon University College of Enginee   Just four years ago I was a cheerleader. Social media was supposed to be the great hope for democracy. I know because I told the world so. I said in 2014 that no-one could predict where this revolution would take us. My conclusion was dusted with optimism: a better connected human race would find a way to better itself. I was only half right: nobody could indeed have predicted where we have ended up. Yet my optimistic prognosis was utterly misguided. Social media has led to less human interaction, not more. It has suppressed human development, not stimulated it. As Big Tech has marched onward, we have regressed. Look at the evidence. Research shows that social media may well be making many of us unhappy, jealous and – paradoxically – antisocial. Even Facebook gets it. An academic study that Facebook cited in its corporate blog post revealed that when people spend a lot of time passively consuming information they wind up feeling worse. Just ten minutes on Facebook is enough to depress – clicking and liking a multitude of posts and links seems to have a negative effect on mental health. Meantime, the green-eyed monster thrives on the social network: reading rosy stories and/or carefully controlled images about the social- and love-lives of others leads to poor comparisons with one’s own existence. Getting out in the warts-and-all real world and having proper conversations would provide a powerful antidote. Some chance! Humans have convinced themselves that ‘catching up’ online is a viable alternative to in-person socializing. And what of consumer choice? Don’t book your next city break via Google. Research shows that a typical search for a family vacation begins with “the best hotels in…” or the “top ten hotels in…”. Yet these searches return paid-for links from big identikit hotel companies and well-funded broker websites. Local bloggers, like the guy in Jaipur or the girl in Paris who make it their job to suggest the most interesting stays, don’t appear until search page ten (AKA nowhere). Discovering real places, recommended by locals and run by real people, got a lot harder in the internet age. Guidebooks used to do the job, but few buy them anymore. We are becoming unthinkingly reliant – addicted – to ease-of-use at the expense of quality. We are walking dumpsters for internet content that we don’t need and which might actively damage our brains. The technology industry also uses another technique to keep us hooked: feeding us a bottomless pit of information. This phenomenon’ is the effect Netflix has when it auto-plays the next episode of a show after a cliffhanger and you continue watching, thinking, “I can make up the sleep over the weekend.” The cliffhanger is, of course, always replaced by another cliffhanger. The 13-part season is followed by another one, and yet another. We spend longer in front of the television yet we feel no more satiated. When Facebook, Instagram and Twitter tack on their scrolling pages and update their news feeds, causing each article to roll into the next, the effect manifests itself again. Perhaps we should go back to our smartphones and, instead of playing Netflix or sending texts on WhatsApp, use their core function. Call up our friends and family and have a chat or – better – arrange to meet them. Meanwhile, Big Tech could carve an opportunity from a crisis. What about offering a subscription to an ad-free Google? In return for a monthly fee, searches would be based on quality of content rather than product placement. I would pay for that. The time-savings alone when booking a trip would be worth it. Apple pioneered the Do Not Disturb function which stopped messages and calls waking us from sleep, unless a set of emergency-criteria were met by the caller. How about a Focus Mode that turned off all notifications and hid our apps from our home screen, to ease the temptation to play with our phones when we should be concentrating on our work, or talking to our spouses, friends and colleagues? In the 1980s, the BBC in Britain ran a successful children’s series called Why Don’t You? that implored viewers to “turn off their TV set and go out and do something less boring instead”, suggesting sociable activities that did not involve a screen. It was wise before its time. The TV seems like a puny adversary compared to the deadening digital army we face today.   This is based on my forthcoming book, Your Happiness Was Hacked, which will show you how you can take control and live a more balanced technology life. You can pre-order the book, coauthored with Alex Salkever: https://www.amazon.com/Your-Happiness-Was-Hacked-Brain/dp/1523095849
    科技发展
    2018年04月30日